Oh !! J(a)NU - ye hai Politics

Recently a fee hike announced in the JNU created much noise. Students protested against the hike and their was even a small roll back from the administration on the hike. However, protests continued.

Soon the social media was full of comments that connected the earlier controversies on the JNU campus (alleged anti-nationalism) to the current protest and arguments have started to fly around everywhere. So while there are valid arguments on both side - however most arguments tend to miss the big picture. Like it often happens in the recent history of our country - many of these arguments are irrelevant, hypocritical or they miss the big picture. Let us try and cut the clutter and try to understand the issue for what it is. Long post warning.

What Exactly is the Hike like?
Here it is in summary - the old fee, the one announce and then the new structure after a small rollback. (source : India Today)

Rent	Old fee	Fee announced earlier	New Revised fee
Single room seater	Rs 20	Rs 600	Rs 200
Double room seater	Rs 10	Rs 300	Rs 100
Security deposit for mess	Rs 0	Rs 5,500	Rs 5,500
Utility charges	Rs 0	Rs 1,700	Rs 1,700

So obviously the revised fee was probably announced to calm down tempers. 
The original levels of fee obviously seem ridiculously low and belongs to an earlier era when engineering graduate like us paid a total four year fee of about Rs. 5000. One must consider this fee hike modest by all standards. So then why so much noise around the issue.

Let's take a couple of arguments flying around

It's taxpayer's money

I find this one the most amusing, hypocritical and absurd argument. Some commenters go to the extent of commenting - "these students are getting fed on our money". Come on. Let's get our facts right - education in all government aided colleges/institutes is subsidised to small or large extent. You may dislike JNU for many reasons, but at the end of the day it is a central university and will receive grant and subsidies like any other.

The Big picture.
For last decade or so budgeted figure for education in expenditure 2.7% of GDP - almost stagnant below 3%. This is woefully inadequate for a young country like India. Close to 12 lakh (1.2 million) students appear for JEE the engineering exam every year - it would be safe to say that almost double that number must be appearing for non technical courses. Even this amount is not fully utilised every year. Yes !! you will be surprised to know that the Government collects more money from education cess (approx 95,000 cr.) than it actually allocates (approx 85,000 cr.). It is a fact the money that is collected under the consolidated fund head does not get utilised fully every year (which is other words means cess collected under various heads get spent on other wasteful heads).

If we compare it to other countries - Zimbabwe, Bhutan, Sweden & finland etc spend some 7 to 7.5% of their GDP on education, South Africa & Brazil spend about 6% of their GDP, UK/Netherland about 5.5% Malaysia, kenya, US etc spend 5%. The point is this - we do not really spend enough on education of our youth.

The JNU figures
JNU spends close to 550 crores every year at an overall student strength of about 8000 students. Out of this approx 350 crores is contributed by the government. Thats approx 4.4 lakh per student per year. This is largely in synch with what government spends on most top universities and institutes.

Is the spend justified ??
According to 2019 budget figures we spend more than education on Home affairs, Rural development, agriculture and allied activities and, hold your breath, tax administration. Yes - this is also taxpayers' money. If we add many small expenditures in the budget that basically serves to keep many departments alive - we may find expense on education just peanuts. Remember Modiji's promise of "minimum government, maximum governance" - had he implemented that promise - he would have much more to spend on education making it easy for more people to get education.

We spend much more money subsidising other more questionable expenditure.
For Eg.
** Do you know that government spends approx Rs 2.7 lakhs per month on subsidising various perquisites to every Member of Parliament,
one can similarly compare more apples with such oranges - For eg. the
** Government is going to pay the bills of incompetence in
PSU banks (the NPA crisis),
the cooperative banking systems (many banks like that of PMC bank,
the Non Banking Financial companies (NBFCs) (After the ILFS meltdown - just today the DHFL board has been overtaken by the SEBI),
** It is investing thousands of crores to revive real estate projects that are stuck because of their promoters corruption, scams or simply incompetence.
** The Government is also going to foot the bills of carrying on with incompetent, obsolete and corrupt PSUs like BSNL, Air India just to name a few.
** The government is also spending on 3000 crore statue or 4000 crore advertising through various departments. We spend thousands of crores every year on corrupt, leaky public distribution system and many more thousand crores on renaming of cities too.
All this money is taxpayer money.

The point being : 

Now, don't get me wrong. These figures are presented not necessarily to support the protest at JNU but to point out at the futility of the argument of it all being taxpayer's money. If we are really worried about how the government is using the taxpayer's money - education is probably the last head to look at. We must first ask our government about the list mentioned above - or we should ask them about why the Government keeps asking LIC to foot the bill for disinvestment that they are unable to sell to private players because they don't want to let go management controls from PSUs.

The taxpayer money is a sham argument in my view.

40 Year old students enjoy life at JNU on government subsidies

There is a classic folly in statics and argumenting - that often "we treat anecdotal evidence as data" or "we make the exception the rule" simply because it supports our narrative or our belief. The IT Cell wallahs use this folly in public thinking, to the hilt. That's why such arguments look compelling and strong. Let's start with some data digging.

At JNU  there are close to 8000 students out which an overwhelming 72% are from social sciences, language, literature& arts and International studies. 55% of the total students are pursuing M Phil and pHD. This kind of explains the overall higher age profile of the JNU students. There maybe a few students in the age group of 40 plus (I could not get any data on that and so I say this on gut observation) - which although asynchronous but isn't something to be worried about. There are large number of people who decide to pursue their pHDs and masters a little later in their lives.

What should matter to us is the average number of years they spend on the campus - for which again their is no data but for a pHD student 5-7 years of stay is normal. If this is a real worry for administrators - all they have to do is define a maximum number of years on campus for each course. This as justification to fee hike or for that matter a case against subsidies on education is a very poor argument.

Another data - more than 40% of students at the JNU are from families that have a an income of Rs 10,000 per month. This may give us an idea of the fact that the spend in the JNU is actually being spent on education of very poor students.

The age angle adds more to the subsidy debate. Most pHD students in the best of institutes of the world (including India) are not made to pay for their education - in fact they often get a stipend at the institute for pursuing research.

BTW - the anecdotal evidence converted into data is also true of the "tukde tukde gang/anti-national" argument. First the entire episode is a story of concocted truths, morphed videos and the likes. Even if we assume that there were students involved in the sloganeering - they obviously do not represent the entire GNU student crowd. It is generalising the exception to form a rule because it supports a narrative.

The point being 

The age argument is raised to generate passion among youth but has really no basis. Most probably there aren't so many middle aged students in JNU (or other universities), secondly the few who are there should not be a cause of concern and finally JNU is expected to have higher average age than other universities because of its course mix.

So is the fee hike not justified ??
I don't think so. However, it is more complicated than just a fee hike.

As the table at the start of this piece shows - the old fee levels are ridiculously low - they probably would not even cover the expenses of administering the fee collection at today's rate. So a fee hike is ok.

On the other hand - education is a individual right as well as an investment for the country. It generates its own return for the economy, country and its people in the decades/centuries that follow. This is why most democracies are actually moving towards making education free. In Gujarat modi ji made education free for all females. It was a great move in the right direction. So, fee subsidies are also justified because at least poverty should not deprive people of basic needs and education.

However, for a country like India with its huge population and innumerable challenges - free education for everybody is a very far off goal. In the meantime - it is my view, that at least top institutes where students reach based on merit should provide free or highly affordable education. The graduates in non-technical education have historically not been huge earners and it is important to keep the cost of their education low so that the ROI on this investment is justified. Thankfully now non-technical education also has started looking up as a means to better earning employment.

In short, at least in the area of education how much to subsidise and what not to, is a thin balancing act and so it is better to err on this side of divide instead of letting the aim of education be defeated to save some money.

To put it more crudely I would subsidise education expense of lazy incompetent students rather than draining it on corrupt incompetent bureaucrats, politicians and their NGOs and PSUs.

in my view, in today's India we need to focus on improving and ensuring school education more and should focus on self financing of higher education. In higher education we should gradually move to a model of Government funding capital and infrastructure of education while running and maintaining education should largely be managed by the institute through its academic, consulting and research activities. Thus I favour gradual reduction and final elimination of subsidising institute's operations.

Many Institutes in India have hiked fee successfully to various extents. I did my engineering from a State Level Institute for less than 5000 rs between 1989 and 1993. However the same institute now charges close to 5 lakhs for the same course. I took an educational loan of Rs. 83,000 to do my Post Graduation in Management from IIM Lucknow. My seniors paid half that amount - their seniors probably paid about 10,000-15,000 for the same course. Today IIMs charge between 18 to 25 Lakhs for the same course. The same happened to the IITs and many such institutes. Education loans are easily available for such courses - I got one recently for my son who joined an IIT. Let me also point out that the process has been going on since the days of P V Narsimha Rao, Dr. Manmohan singh, Atalji and now. Never have we seen such acrimony.

Then why such shrill noise on the JNU fee hike
That is the million dollar question to answer. There are multiple answers to this question - one word for which is politics

One, JNU is unlike many other universities. It has been a politically active campus. It has always questioned the power of governments. Even in days of emergency it has fought the powers tooth and nail - politicians like Arun Jaitley and N Sitharaman are JNU products of the same time. In an earlier era this campus used to be hub of the yippe culture in an orthodox and conservative India. Today that culture has travelled to corners of the country. Student protests are nothing new - In fact they are good for the society and country. If they are protesting it needs to be handled better. Crushing a student protest using brutal police force is a strict no-no.

Two, Not that such institutes never had protests - but those protests were managed better by the administration. They created dialogues with students (unlike the VC of JNU who did not even meet the students), they discussed, debated and continued diligently. I agree JNU is a tougher nut to crack because of its legacy but using force to handle the situation is obviously not a solution. Government has raised fee across IITs, NITs and many other institutes in their post graduate and pHD departments - students have felt the pinch of it and have protested in their small little ways.

Remember the first long protest under modiji at another such institute - The FTTI - where students were up in arms against the newly appointed director - Mr. Gajendra. Now honestly students were right - the appointment of Gajendra on the post was a complete misfit. However in a show of nerves the administration and the students pitched against each other and gradually the administration tired the agitation down without use of lathi charge or such things.

Three, Delhi being the location of the institute is what attracts so much attention to these protests. On a single call media and cameras from all national/regional/local channels stand outside the gate for any sensational byte. Some of them actually egg such students on. It gets discussed on national TV. Social media adds fuel to the fire. I am sure if this fee hike would have happened in Timbuktu - no flutter would have happened.

Four, JNU is a left bastion. Current government and its student wing has been trying to capture the local politics of the place and have not been very successful till now. This campus asks very uncomfortable questions to the powers that be. That seems to be a single biggest reason. Anyone who has closely watched this dispensation on how they react to any criticism or opposition whether it be avenging by letting the central investigations agencies like CBI, IT, or ED to pursue cases against opposition or the way they react to media persons who critiques its work or the way target student union leaders who criticises them, makes one feels that the handling of the JNU crisis is far beyond the fee hike issue. It is naked, brazen politics being played to warn everybody that dissent will be handled with a strong hand by the state.

Modiji would remember long back when he was a part of a student protest in Gujarat in which the great JP became a star. Modiji himself influenced by JP contributed to the movement that spread so wide that Congress was thrown out of power in the state. This is available on his own site - narendramodi.in The same police that was revolting against the state for mishandling of their personnel by the lawyers whereas they did not take enough steps to control the law and order, is now treating the student unions at JNU with a iron hand. If this is not politics what is.

JNU like many other universities is a monument of the immense diversity that we are a collection of as a country. A simple fee hike needs to be managed as an internal affair and be given less air time. Not everything in India needs to be seen with political prism. The Government & its supporters should soon learn to accept that there will always be criticism and that avenging every person, institution or critique is foolhardy, arrogant and in the end useless.

The JNU drama on the national level is probably sceptical politics at its worst. 

koshyari ki hoshyari

Figure this out - Maharashtra Assembly Poll results came out on the 24th October.

The Governor of Maharashtra - Bhagat Singh Koshyari - waited for almost two weeks for the winning alliance of the BJP-Shiv Sena to stake claim. For all these days he did not take any proactive step to initiate an invite to the largest party to form the government.

On 9th Nov when the previous assembly term was completed he invited the BJP. The BJP finally indicated that they do not have the majority.

He then invited, on 10th Nov, the next largest Party Shiv Sena to form the Government and gave them 24 hours to express their willingness to form the government. SS showed willingness to form a government and asked for more time - surprisingly the Governor refused giving more time.

He then invited the third largest Party and gave them time till 8:30 in the evening of 12th November to express willingness to form the government. It is reported that NCP also asked for more time to prove majority (although this is not established as of now on the morning of 13th). The Governor not only refused more time - he went ahead and sent his recommendation to the cabinet for imposition of President's rule in the state much before his own deadline of 8:30 PM on tuesday the 12th of Nov.

The cabinet met quickly under PM modi who was to leave for Brazil soon after (connect the dots if you can). It passed a resolution in a ziffy and sent its recommendation to the President for imposition of president rule in Maharashtra.

The president was in Punjab attending a function and he was to return by the evening. Once he was back - he signed the order immediately. Quite uncharacteristically the president did not even wait for one night to take legal opinion from his advisors on the situation. More so, because the report of the Governor does not mention the possibility or situation of horse trading for winning support. He simply mentions that the there is no possibility of formation of a stable government in the state.

Unbecoming of Constitutional Posts
In less than half a day the imposition of president rule was completed almost as if everyone is working on a cue. Now maharashtra is not a unstable state or a special case. In fact in this particular situation almost all parties seemed to be tightly together - and were negotiating terms of alliance to form a government.

The role of the governor should have been to help formation of government minimising the possibility of horse trading. What he did instead was - showed an unusual hurry to impose president rule. What he did was unbecoming of his constitutional post. The President Ram Nath Kovind also missed the chance to be a statesman president by signing the order in a hurry. The inherent checks and balances in the system as a result failed to work - it seems, because in all key posts important constitutional functionaries seemed to be working like party workers.

Issues
Many people point out that imposition of president rule still means that a majority government can be formed in the next six months. True, but that is not the point. The point is the Governor acted in an unusual hurry almost as a stooge of the ruling party because otherwise there was no way BJP could have formed a government. Now the field is wide open to the BJP. And it is anybody's guess as to who could resort to horse trading.

Two, more worrying is the reaction of people at large. I am sure you are also part of whatsapp group of friends who are happy at imposition of president rule - just because they don't feel Shiv sena should come to power. Now, I am no shiv sena fan but this end cannot and must not justify the means resorted to in this matter. Shivsena won 56 seats and so however much we dislike them - they must have a say in the Government. The reaction and acceptance of people is very worrying to the Indian democracy. More worrying is the approach of many educated elite Indians who easily justify this by pointing out that governors and presidents in the past also have been stooges to the Congress governments. This of course is true and should not matter now.

Both the Governor and the President failed to act in the spirit of constitutional democracy in my view. Though, this is not new but post 1990s we have had some stellar Presidents who acted with patience and maturity in such situations. Even those governors leaning towards the ruling party in these years, followed at least some constitutional norms. They would allow reasonable time followed by a floor test in most cases. I think the recommendation of president rule even before completion of the self given deadline to the NCP, by the Governor must be unprecedented in the history of independent India. It is embarrassing. One is bound to conclude that his hurry was because the PM was to leave teh country by the evening - that would have given more time to SS-NCP-INC combine to stitch an alliance.

Very sad times for the Indian Democracy. The BJP strategists seem to trying to create an equivalent of a corporate monopoly in the Indian democracy and it surely cannot be good for the country.

Movie Review - "The Sky is Pink"

I remember watching a movie "Dard Ka Rishta" released way back in 1982, I was 10 years old then, that beautifully weaved a story of a father of a daughter suffering from blood cancer. Sunil dutt saheb was unforgettable in the role of the father.

I had started to expect a millenial's version of Dard Ka Rishta as I sat through the first half of "The Sky is Pink". However, the movie amazingly went quite much beyond Dard ka Rishta and took the audience through 145 minutes of a veritable maze of emotions from extreme happiness to pitless depth of sentimental sadness of being helpless fighter - leaving them fazed at the end with mixture of feelings that is difficult to describe in words but is definitely worth experiencing.

Based on a true story of a girl Aisha who, since birth, is affected by a rare disease SCID - a condition in which the child takes birth without any immune system. The movie is a moving tale - diligently pieced together - delicately narrated - tastefully cinematographed - of her life its ups and downs, the joys and frustration, the struggles of her parents and much more.

The movie has so many threads that one has to be alert to have touched all of them even as an audience, and that is in appreciation of the director. I can call it a love story between two people so unconditional that one wonders how strong a bond can two people ever build; I can also call it a tale of a brave girl who is about to die, but lives her life to the fullest or I can call it a story of dedicated parents who go to the end of the earth for their kid; One can also live it as a saga of a closely knit family that stays together through the travails of life, becoming the reason for each other's happiness.I have not even mentioned smaller - minor threads like the chemistry or relationship of mother-daughter, father-daughter or brother-sister etc. 

It raises very difficult questions - the push pull of faith against science: the dilemma of choosing a treatment trying for longevity laced with uncertainty of a painful life; the quest for openness to adjust to individual choices in a system of shared stakes: the deep troubles of

two people living together with diametrically opposite ways of dealing with one's sorrows and hence misunderstanding the other as being insensitive and callous; The age old story of a Chandni chowk boy falling in love with a south delhi girl and there interesting chemistry. The beauty is that all this is done without being melodramatic, keeping it almost real - believable; in fact, I it is done with rare touch of spunky light heartedness.- always sincere, never trivialised. 

Some sequences stay with you and shall haunt.The father begging for help on the Radio, the mother sanitising the grave, the sister sharing her fears with her brother and the bro helping her settle down, from the another corner of the world - in the process getting upset himself, the video speech of a terminally ill daughter, the farewell speech of the father, the brother narrating how weak he feels inside and I would remember this movie as one that showed a beautiful kiss from a sister to her brother after a long time in a movie. It's an emotional journey.

I am not really a Priyanka Chopra fan, in fact, I was reluctant to watch "The Sky is Blue" because of her and would have given it a miss, had my wife not insisted. It would have been a mistake. Priyanka turns out her life's best performance - she is almost flawless in the character of a modern mother of two millennials. Farhan keeps "rocking on" with his ever sincere attitude and effortless acting. He plays the archetypical Indian father who is all strong outside - melting slowly inside and the only way he is able to show his immense love for his kids is to NOT let them know how weak he feels inside. After Dangal and Secret Superstar - Zaira Wasim does a fabulous job, proving that hers were not a one time wonder performances, earlier. The movie however, is clearly a labour of love of its writer director - Shonali Bose. Every sequence crafted, leaves her indelible mark, so much so, that you don't mind the long movie, which to become a commercial success, needs some brutal editing. She has tried to treat the intense subject and heavy theme of the movie with a light hearted, almost casual attitude of the millennials and dare I say she has succeeded too, largely.

I must warn you that, this is a "difficult to watch" movie. It has been released at the wrong time. In India this is the festive season and most moviegoers are probably looking forward to light, breezy, happy and foot tapping rhythmic movies. So while my recommendation is surely to watch the movie - but don't go looking for an easy on mind, body & soul entertainer. 

थमते थमते थमेंगे आँसू 

रोना है कुछ हँसी नहीं है 

Go for a thought provoking, soul stirring and sentimentally moving experience. It is sad that such movies do not become a talk of the town anymore, unlike the way "Dard ka Rishta" was in its time. I feel the millennials should surely watch it once - because it underlines relevance of a family in a increasingly individual and private world without being preachy about one's choices. Go live the experience.

Finally - Some Economic Reform

Finally the Finance Minister of India moved and announced a substantial tax reform. She announced a reduction in corporate taxes to an effective rate of 25% and a mouth watering 15% for new manufacturing units setup after 1st Oct.

Ex-Finance minister Arun Jaitley in his Budget for the year 2015-16 had promised a phased reduction in corporate tax rates to a 25% over four years. However - it did not appear to be panning out as he had envisaged or we had imagined.. With his eye also on fiscal deficit targets already committed to, it did not look possible and as expected - N. Sitharaman in her debut budget did not announce this reduction. However, just before the deadline the announcement came.

Acknowledgement of Slowdown
The first Good thing about this announcement is that, although a tad late, the Government has finally acknowledged that the economy has slowed down substantially. The fact that the Finance Minister announced this just four months after a budget in which she levied all kind of possible taxes, charges and cess, making it sound that we are now moving to a high tax regime, tells how badly rattled government was because of the slowdown talks and by the fact that her almost weekly announcement of measures were not helping. That the Government waited for sentiments to go overly negative, proves yet again that in India structural reforms will generally happen under pressure of an eminent crisis. Also it is proved yet again that this dispensation in particular will move a step only if it feels that its electoral fortunes are dwindling bu not moving. That the announcement will be applicable for the current financial year is a U turn from a dud budget that was presented by the FM.

Cannot stop myself from taking a dig at all those B..... oops supporters who were forwarding me whatsapp posts digging out figures to suggest that there is no slowdown.

Structural Reform
Bringing down taxation level is a good reform. Most analyst had given up hope of Government meeting Jaitleyji's promise of bringing down So, its a welcome step. This announcement now brings India at par with most developed economies in the world in terms of Corporate Taxation levels.

At a macro level, low taxation is  a signal that Government wishes to move most activities in the private hand and leave less for itself - that's why government should require less revenues. This, if it is the intention, is very good idea. Of course it is too early to say that this is the logic, because till now Modi government has looked for ways to increase government revenues all the time and this step has been taken under a crisis like situation.

Revival of "Make in India"
Even the most ardent supporters of modiji will grudgingly agree that the "Make in India" initiative that was unveiled with a lot of pomp and show did not travel much distance before tapering off. In fact we lost to economies like Taiwan, Thailand and Bangladesh to become the choice for companies shifting production bases out of china.

The FM has announced a 15% tax rate for new manufacturing units set up after 1st October. This is probably a acknowledgement of the miss and an effort to convert opportunities of the second and third waves of industries that shall shift out of China due to the impact of US-China trade war.

It is indeed a good move and should help increase contribution of manufacturing in the GDP as well as in employment generation. However, its impact will not be immediate and so needs to be relooked in the medium term. Also while this is a good move it has the potential to fritter away again if we do not improve on the ground ease of doing business - which basically means continuous assault on the regulating agencies overreach as well as removing harassment of businessmen at the hands of babudom coupled with improved industrial infrastructure - roads, power, water, sanitation, logistics and ports.

Will this revive the sagging Economy?
So we come to the most important question. In my view, reviving a slowing down economy has two parts - one, revival of sentiments (because economic slowdown/recession is a self serving spiral of pessimism) and second, attacking the root cause of slowdown.

Revival of sentiments

The step is a big one and hence it surely helps revive sentiments. She has also made a few more announcement like reduction of MAT, waiver of bubyback tax on buybacks announced before July, and concessions on enhanced surcharge. Already these announcements have got the stock markets in an overdrive - which is a precursor to sentiment revival. This step makes people believe that Government may be working to address the slowdown. It may be sustained by the pre-festival season optimism.

So in short it is a positive boost to sentiment. And it needs to be built upon.

Economic Revival isn't around the corner though
However, here is the catch The slowdown in the economy is primarily because of lack of demand, stagnant exports and credit crunch. The fact is the announcements made on Friday does little to address these issues. What these announcements do is improve profitability of companies by reducing taxes but it does little or nothing to revive demand. Please read a detailed piece I wrote on Sitharaman's budget here read it to understand what ails our economy at this moment. None of those issues were addressed in Friday's announcement.

It will be naive to think that the reduced tax would lead to increased salaries or lower prices - both of which can spur demand. Half the Nifty companies are not really paying a corporate tax of 30 plus percent and hence the benefit to them is very small in any case. And for this benefit to reach the employees and end consumers, if at all, will take long and winding route. To expect this to spur demand in a meaningful way is too optiistic.

There is nothing - not even a thought on policy measures to revive exports.

And while finally recapitalisation of banks has started happening after dragging their feet for long, the NBFC crisis seems to be mothballing on the one hand. What exactly is the approach here - first she has announced stopping loan account of MSMEs as NPA till March 2020 and work on recasting their debt. This is age old trick from the Congress book which this Government has been rightly criticising as evergreening of loans.

And then she announced to my horror, Loan Melas, a horrible socialist idea from the books of congress mismanagement which has historically resulted in loan waivers later. Such loan melas often become a tool to provide money to party supporters and does nothing really to build long term employment generation.

In short then - my expectation is that the slowdown is not adequately addressed by these announcement. It has helped revive the stock market temporarily and has boosted sagging spirits. However, more needs to be done to revive the economy.

What more is needed
The basic principle is to revive demand or spur public expenditure. One part of this is to create a safe secure and confident economic environment by reducing law and order problems, and generating employment opportunities. This government should work on it gradually. It needs to tone down the increasingly virulent divisive debates and actions in administration, party and country in general

Second, is to leave more disposable income in the hands of the people. This Government can and should do. With corporate tax down to global standards it makes sense for government to bring down Income tax rates as well as simplification of tax process. As an example doing away with all exemptions and bring down income tax rates to a maximum of 25% and a minimum of 5-10% could support the positive optimism built and also it can spur demand because of improved levels of disposable incomes in the hands of people. The underlying assumption is that tax evasion will also go down as people would be more willing to pay taxes at a reasonable rate and stop worrying about taxmen knocking at their doors.

Easier said than done
I understand that even my proposals are really tough to bite on - because already the current announcement has dug a 1.45 lakh crores hole in the Government revenues annually. That in a scenario where the government may miss on both the GST collection and Income Tax collection targets set in the budget. This on top of the fact that last year also government missed the tax collection target by close to a trillion rupees. Add to this the fact that fiscal deficit in all probability is much higher than those visible on the government books because of funding some of the government largesse through off balance sheet borrowing.

What all these means is that the Government's fiscal arithmetic is most probably go for a toss. The painstakingly built fiscal prudence targets have already been relaxed by the current announcements and the deficit will go further up with bold moves like these.

However, I think it is time for government to go boldly forward. The crisis of fiscal deficit can help government actually disinvest some of its white elephants like BSNL, Air India etc generating for it badly needed funds as well as plugging some bottomless pits that needs funds from the Government just for remaining alive. A government so popular with people with brutal majority everywhere and hardly any opposition can and should bring about such changes.

In summary
Friday's announcements are a positive step forward but will come a cropper if the Government does not back it up with bold continuous and structural reforms in the economy. Let's hope its coming in the next budget.

Movie Review - Dream Girl

My dad's generation would remember "Dream Girl" as a love story starring the then heart throb of millions - Dharmendra and the graceful beauty - Hema Malini. Bollywood lovers of my generation still hum that unforgettable song - "ड्रीम गर्ल - ड्रीम गर्ल - किसी शायर की गज़ल..."

The Modern day "Dream Girl" is about neither a dream nor a girl. It's about a nightmare and a male who is a girl. It gives an altogether new connotation to the word "Dream Girl".

It is light, breezy, sweet story of a lower middle class boy of UP - struggling to survive in a tough real world with just one unique talent of his. That uniqueness leads him into a misfit of a job. His unique talent helps him excel in a job that was not made for him in the first place. So far so good - however, due to his job he ends up creating a virtual world of imaginations & dreams and in the process entangles himself with a few real characters in his life, jeopardising his relationship with his fiancee and his reputation.

And so, the audience is taken through a tipsy topsy journey of smiles, giggles, laughs in this interesting situational comedy, some great timing in delivery creating a largely clean, light hearted, comedy. Fell short of being a laugh riot and still is a very watchable movie.

"Dream Girl" is not without its flaws. First, it seems stretched at times. Better editing could have surely made the movie more interesting. In fact, one doesn't know what three fairly long songs were doing in the movie. The audience wouldn't have noticed absence of at least two of them. Or for that matter - the emotional scene where the son revels on the goodness of his father innocently sleeping, could have been completely done away with. 

Second, peculiarities of a few characters have been  accentuated too strongly to the extent of they becoming a caricature and so they stop generating comedy. Example - father becoming a muslim and changing the entire environment around him was too much. Similarly the character of a frustrated female boss remains far from convincing.

Third, there was no need to use double entendres around Hindi cuss words to generate comedy. It offers a certain touch of crudeness to the otherwise clean and cute narrative. Or maybe I am just being a prude - because the young generation in the hall did not seem to mind at all and were happily sharing a laugh.

Finally and the most important one - honestly the unique talent of the protagonist "pooja" does not really seem so enticing that everybody in the world from a teenager to a father of a nubile boy bends over their backs to fall for her.

Having said that this movie was not created to be logical in any case and it did touch the funny bone of everybody in the hall so many times that we can overlook its flaws. Like in most movies of this genre the director does get lost in the climax but quickly recovers and in the end manages well. In fact, the editing towards the end of the movie seems to be jerky leaving a feeling that the director now wants to end in a hurry, while he was dragging his feet in most parts.

Ayushman Khurana is a lucky guy, he often gets movies that revolve character he is playing. One must say that he also has the courage to take risky and experimental roles - from vicky donor to Dream girl - it has paid off well for him. Relaxed comedies is where he is best at and so this role suits him well and he does a fine job. However, I keep feeling that he fails to live up to the challenging characters he often gets. Manjot singh since his role in Fukrey is type casted as a dumb sardar which he delivers with boring regularity. Vijay Raaj, Anu kapoor and Rajesh sharma are accomplished actors and they delivered their side of over acting quite well. Nusrat is beautiful and bubbly as required - however her character did not have much scope to show her acting - so she lends the needed cuteness factor in a movie which is again full of male characters.

This is one of those movies that do not have any unforgettable moments and yet overall a good package. Nice one time watch - if you are looking for some harmless funny time with family/friends. Just don't take your mind to the theatre and enjoy.

Movie Review - "छिछोरे"

Take college friendship from "Dil chahta hai", Nostalgia from "Rock On", zest & inspiration from "Jo jeeta Vo Sikandar", and innocent Love from "Qayamat se Qayamat Tak" - add to it just the right amount of tragedy, laughter, hope and a nail biting climax, that does not finish the movie; and yes garnish it with just the right background sound, finely narrated story and crisply cooked dialogues and very well timed comedy - resulting into a delectable, fresh, aromatic, shaken not stirred dish that leaves a pleasant tingling after taste long after you reslished it - I am talking about the movie "Chichore (छिछोरे)". 

After a long long while a movie that thoroughly entertains. No, it is not a edge of the seat thriller; No, it is not a Love story (thank God); No, it is not even a biopic; and sorry but no, it is not even a spell binding action movie. It is like - to borrow a simile from the lady in a currently popular ad - the matt finish : "ऐसा लगता है कुछ कराया नहीं है but कराया है"

If you can see the wily-nily, tipsy-topsy, iffy-buty, hook or crook, effort that I put in the first paragraph to express the amount of effort that Nitesh Tiwari put in creating this movie and then you also realise that despite all that effort, I turned out to be loser in expressing it and yet you feel very happy because of the sheer effort I put in that paragraph - you will then admire and appreciate the movie as much as I do.

The movie is about six friends from an engineering college who are brought together again by a tragedy remembering & reliving their college days, - surprised that the most loveable affair of that time has resulted in a divorce and realising how far they have come from those days. Seems familiar - isn't it? A whiff of all those movies that I named in that immense effort of a paragraph. 
Trust me - it's not familiar. I mean - Familiar nahi bhi hai aur hai bhi. Remember Matt finish. 😊 

The soul - the "जान" - of the movie is how the experiences of the college life of these six friends have been weaved into a story of a young, hard working, aspiring boy who is on the edge. It gives the movie a purpose - delivering a powerful message. In that sense this movie goes beyond "Rock on" or "dil chahta hai". It starts on a sad, almost depressing, note but then Tiwari is able to keep it light, breezy and entertaining. The message is delivered without being preachy. That is quite an achievement.

The movie is set in a hostel of an engineering college which most Engineers my age, all my seniors and my juniors upto at least ten batches will easily relate to. The crazy things students used to do in the college especially in a hostel of those days, the funny odd pet names they get, the life long bonds they create, the affection - the fights - the pranks - the jokes - the ragging, even the campa cola and the Gold Spot in the canteen and yes that Boys and Girls Hostel thing - which is almost impossible to put in words. And Yes before I forget - the bond that one develops for his/her hostel at a college. It's almost like patriotism for your country - isn't it!?

You easily start relating to one or the other character with ones that you had in your college times. Then enters the Hostel rivalry - reminiscent in parts of "Jo Jeeta Wo Sikandar" and yet "Chichore" goes beyond. Yup it does - am tempted to tell you when - but better you discover it yourself. No wonders - only an IIT Mumbai graduate as Director could have portrayed all this so well.

The beauty of the movie is that it does not have a Hero - not even a heroine and yes no villain too. I mean all of them are not there, but they are there too. Remember, the matt finish. 😊

The absence of a big star in the movie ensures that all characters are well developed properly introduced and very well used in the movie. And dare I say all of them played their characters rather superbly. Varun Sharma is in his full form - he is a natural at comedy. It's so effortless that he does not even appear like acting. Both "Fukrey" and "Fukrey Returns" were watchable only because of him (& Richa Chaddha). He makes this movie too a light happy one. After this movie he is added to the list of great talents that bollywood often ends up wasting in trivial roles. 

Sushant is in his elements - looking cute, responsible, helpless, fighting and confident with an uncanny ease. It's probably his best performance till now. Naveen, tushar and tahir were new faces to me and were impressive in their roles. They put life in their characters despite the limited footage that they could have got in the scheme of things. Saharsh although not popular but was a known face and, as expected, he did a fine job as "Bevda". Pratik Babbar despite his expression less face does Ok. Even shraddha kapoor does justice to her limited role in the movie and If even I start liking her in the movie it goes as really high praise for the director. In a largely male cast she makes her presence felt by that girlish look. 

Editing is so crisp that there does not appear to be even one second extra. The songs are not really hummable and are forgettable but they fit in the scheme of the movie quite well. One thing that makes a deep impact in the movie are the choice and design of the costumes. They just fit the time and environment painted in the movie. Dialogues so well written that they hit the right chord always. They add verve to the movie - there are many that will ring later but here are two that meant a world to me
"loser का टैग आदमी पहनता भी खुद है और उतारता भी खुद ही है" and
"अब जा  - एक loser की तरह नहीं, एक फाइटर की तरह"

Direction is just perfect - Nitesh Tiwari has turned out another winner after Dangal. However he does better than dangal by delivering a powerful message in this one. He finally found a fine balance between the fine messaging of "chillar party" and great commercial mix of "dangal" in this movie.

"छिछोरे" has a "must watch" rating from me - so go book a ticket if you have not done it already. I have a few statutory disclosures to make - I may have associated more with the movie because of my years in the hostel of my engineering college & my hostel days at the IIML and also because I dropped my son at the door of an IIT just one and a half month back. And this does not give away the most important part of the story. Well actually I have not given away and have given away too. Remember the matt finish. 😊

Finally I left the movie hall with one regret that I did not watch this movie with my son sitting beside me in the hall. So, if you are a parent of a kid, who would soon be entering a college - don't forget to book his tickets too.

The "Ola-Uber"isation of Economic Slowdown

Yesterday, our Finance Minister got the twitterati abuzz with her latest explanation of Slowdown - yes, you got it right - it was because of Ola - Uber services. She really got the social circuit buzzing with her comment that “The automobile and components industry has been affected by BS 6 [norms] and the mindsets of millennial, who now prefer to have Ola and Uber rather than committing to buying an automobile,” Here are the details of what she said.

Initially the jeering of her statement built into #boyacottmillenials trending on social media. Then many also jumped in her support - claiming that she was actually right in her analysis as the trend among young people is to not buy cars. So Is she Right or not in her analysis !?

Millennials' behaviour IS different
First let's acknowledge that surely there are less millennials who wish to buy car because they find the Ola-Uber services easy, cheap and hassle free as compared to owning a car an maintaining it. There is little data to prove it but if you look around this seems to be a growing behaviour - so for a minute let's accept the trend as live and kicking

But there are many slips
The question is does this changing behaviour explain the Slowdown specially in the auto Industry. The answer is not really a surprise - here is why

One, Ola - Uber is a recent trend and can be called in its inception - it has not grown as exponentially to be able to drive a severe slowdown in the auto Industry - in fact it is negative growth in the cars segment. Ola started operations in India in 2010 and Uber in 2013 - I am sure most of us noticed that they are becoming a craze among millennials by around 2015-16 as they started reaching rung - B cities.

Two, What exactly is the reach of these services - how many cities do they operate in !? I tried searching for that data on Ola and Uber sites but it was not easily available So I did some global search and unverified reports pin that down to about 40 cities (which is also the number of Indian cities with population of more than a million) - Let's increase that number by 50% and assume they are available in 60 cities just to err on the right side of the argument. Now we have close to 4000 cities in India with population of between one Lakh and a million.

The point I am making is pretty clear; we can possibly ascribe the slowdown to Ola-Uber trend only if they have a substantial reach - but obviously they don't have the reach.

Third, The growth of Ola Uber themselves is slowing down. Yes from a growth of 90% YOY in 2016 to a meagre 4.5% in 2019.. These services too are experiencing a slowdown like companies in most other sectors. To suggest that they are the reason for slowdown in the first place is itself ingenuity at best and is plainly a distraction at its worst.

Oh !! and not just that
Some rational readers point out that she did not just say Ola Uber - she also said moving to BS-VI norms as the reason. Yes that's true as well. But as one would realise BS-VI is sixth such norm - we weathered through to BS-IV without such a draconian fall in sales. It is foolhardy to believe that half the buyers are waiting for BS-VI cars to get launched before buying. In fact passenger vehicles saw five straight month of YOY decline of 20 plus percent. The August figure is a scary 31% out of which cars alone saw a decline of 41% yes you read it Right. (Refer the table)

There is more to the trendThat's not the complete story - Ask her, what explains a similar decline in sales of Two wheelers (refer to the table) - Five straight months of 10+% decline yoy with August touching a 20+% decline. BTW the decline is in all segments - scooters, Bikes and Mopeds.

And how does Ola-Uber growth explain the pain in Commercial Vehicles sales (refer the same table) - Five straight months of 10+% drop yoy with August decline of 40+%.

Oh !! And what about Tractor Sales decline (refer graph) Data for current month not easily available but a simple google search will tell us that the July Sales for two major tractor manufacturers M&M and Escorts fell 10% to 11% yoy in July 2019 and for M&M 17% decline in Aug 2019.

Obviously none of these slides can be explained by Ola-Uber trends.

Ms. FM we are facing a wider slowdown
One of the bigger picture view that the FM seems to be missing in her press conference is that the slowdown is not just in auto sector but is wide and will probably go deep. Textiles is reporting closure of units, Sales of innerwears (underwears & vests), of FMCG goods, of Biscuits, of Airline Traffic - all are declining.

Help us understand how they are declining??

In summary
Author-Analyst-Columnist Vivek Kaul puts it brilliantly - "We have managed to trivialise the entire economic slowdown around two points of Uber and Ola and millenials not buying cars. This is whataboutery at its very best." What we are facing is a lack of consumption/demand growth because people are simply spending less and why !? According to vivek simply because the economic environment around is uncertain even risky - consumers aren't confident of their economic security in the future hence they are saving - anticipating a rainy day. 

But I digress - we were discussing the Finance Minister's statement. In short and blunt opinion of mine - it is bunkum. At the best it is trying to distract from the larger problem but scaringly at its worst - it is a denial that a real problem exists in the economy.  

5 Trillion $ Economy at 5% GDP Growth !?

The Indian economy popped up a shocker yesterday. For the first quarter of the financial year 2019-20 it slowed down to a surprising 5% - well below the street expectation of about 5.6-5.7% which itself would not have been happy. A quick look at current data.

• Gross Value Added (GVA) slowdown to 4.9% from 5.7% last quarter;
• Mining sector slowed down to 2.7% from an already weak 4.2% previous qrtr;Manufacturing slowed to a meagre 0.6 % compared to 3.1% in the last quarter;
• Construction too slowed down to 5.7% from  a 7.1%;
• financial services sector witnessed slowing down to 5.9 from 9.5%;

Only two sectors one agriculture and second "Trade, hotel, transport, communication" achieved minor positive growth. Former grew by 2% from a 0.1% and the latter stood at 7.1 up from 6% last quarter . However agriculture at 2% is laughable - given that Government is targeting doubling the farmer income by 2024.

Bad News
This is bad news - 1QFY20 is fifth consecutive quarter of declining GDP growth. The lowest in six years (four quarters). This is the lowest ever under the leadership of PM modi. Before this, the fourth quarter in 2013 saw a meagre growth of 4.3% in the last days of policy paralysis of UPA-II. However, even that comparison may not be valid because this 5% is on new data series and possibly when compared apple to apple the 4.3% of 4QFY13 was probably better.


Not Surprising
While this is bad news it is not a surprise. In many posts earlier too - I have pointed out to the impending slowdown as one after the other industrial sectors signalled severe slowdown. Read my budget analysis here

But that was recent future. I have been pointing out to declining saving rate, lack of consumption demand, stagnant exports, increasing unemployment, sluggish & incremental approach to economic reforms.

Add to them the adventure like demonetisation, incompetent handling of one major reform - the GST, Increased regulatory mindset - moving to more license raaj, killing of autonomy of major institutions, shift towards a higher tariff - higher taxation regime and it is easy to understand why the economy seems to sputtering at all levels.

Lost Opportunities
It would be easy and simplistic to blame Global environment for the slowdown All slowdowns are part cyclical. However we will be fools if we missed the fact that this slowdown is majorly structural and very poorly managed economically.

We faced a much stronger cyclical headwind way back in 2009 with much more finesse. In fact the major reform of introduction and implementation of service tax was multifold better than the implementation of GST. 

I have been pointing out that Modi Government has been the luckiest government that India ever had. It saw the longest spell of Moderate to very low oil prices, benign dollar because of slowing down of American Economy, rapidly declining chinese economy, comfortable - even strong majority in the Government, a popular and widely accepted PM.

And yet the Government failed on most major structural reforms that were badly needed - For example it failed to aggressively privatise the public sector, or it failed to boost manufacturing, it dragged its feet on cleaning the Banking NPA mess for far too long, It did nothing to mitigate the impacts of Demonetisation on the real cash economy of India. We may have been climbing the ease of doing business rankings but honestly on the ground doing business is more problematic than ever - with both costs and regulatory hurdles increasing.

On the positive side the implementation of IBC and some infrastructural focus (like roads and cleanliness) are good long term measures and will have positive impact on the economy but very poor short term management is a huge problem.

Wrong Focus
Water tight control on most institutions that should have been autonomous, managing media narrative by muting dissenting voices, obfuscating uncomfortable data to avoid fixing responsibility, living in denial about obvious problems in the economy, and blaming all troubles on past Governments as far back as that of Nehru are some of the attitudes that are beyond understanding from any rational point of view. 

Instead the government probably tried to distract attention from economic mess by raising the ante on nationalism, anti-pak rhetoric and some religious/cultural issues. It would be foolhardy however to believe that bread and butter issues will be forgotten for long in the jingoism around Nationalism. Sooner or later economy will have to be center of attention even for the voting public. 

Even on policy - the government focussed too much on revenue generation rather than boosting demand by leaving more in the hands of consuming public.

If one studied the rosy GDP growth rate data of Modi 1.0 it was largely due to Government spending - while private consumption largely remained dull and exports & manufacturing listless. The attached graph shows non-Government GDP growth rate. It comes to 4.5% for the last quarter. So we end up moving back to nineties where taxation levels rose, Baburaaj grew - taxmen seems to be knocking at everyone's doors smelling for tax evasion threatening with punitive measures. But startup India, or Make in India languish because of unfriendly policies. 

The modi style of Governance focuses on grand gala announcements often not backed up by painstaking implementation - so we had a high pitched promotion of having opened 1.2 crores jan dhan accounts in a day in 2014 but till 2019 the Direct Benefit transfer of subsidies is limited to agricultural and LPG subsidies. While we had a midnight parliament session to launch the GST - but now we are saddled with an unwieldy, poorly thought and implemented tax regime which has choked liquidity, all but killed MSME & SME and has in all probability actually increased costs. The core promise of the GST - invoice matching still remains a mirage. Similarly we had two-three years of international jamboree on "Make in India" but manufacturing in India is gasping for breath and we are losing to other asian economies in grabbing the shift of manufacturing bases from China. I can go on with this list - however suffice it to say that most initiatives lacked on the ground plan to manage teething troubles.

In sum
So here are the structural issues to address in the economy. It is not too late - the Indian economy offers huge opportunities but the Government needs to change its attitude, approach and acceptance. Incremental steps like bank recapitalisation or mergers alone will not help - we need immediate and bold steps to simplify processes, to improve liquidity, to remove interventionist governance.

Let me take two macro examples - The government aims at doubling farm income by 2024 (after having failed at doing so by 2019 earlier). This will require agriculture to grow at more than 14% annually for five years. That is impossible. Alternatively we will need to move the workforce from agriculture to services and manufacturing so that the remaining farmer's incomes double. But rising unemployment and listless manufacturing growth are suggesting that this is also just a grand announcement.

The other example is that the Government wants to reach a $5 trillion economy by 2024. This will require a nominal GDP growth of 12% consistently with a 4% inflation. We are currently at 5% GDP growth and the inflation is close to 4.3% assuming these are not fudged figures.

Will we wake up to economic realities or simply conduct another surgical strike to distract and then will chant - Vande Mataram.

Movie Review - "Super 30"

With movies like "Chillar Party "and "Queen" under his belt (despite a forgettable "shandaar") one held a lot of hope from vikas bahl's foray into a biopic. So I went to watch "Super 30" with a sense of anticipation. Add to that my association with the world of academics and of parallel education - I was personally almost excited about the movie. 

The problem for the director was that everyone knew the story - It is a story about a person alive and kicking in our current society. We know him as someone who devised and executed the concept of "Super 30" - name given to collecting and training 30 potentially sharp students from poor backgrounds for the coveted IITJEE and to get them selected to the august corridors of the IVY league of Indian education. The story is of Anand Kumar who dedicated himself to this cause and despite the seemingly insurmountable odds and resistance from all quarters, succeeds in the mission. 

So, what can the script and the director do to make the movie interesting. I think the director faced the dilemma of whether to make the movie more inspirational or more entertaining. As the director of Chillar Party and Queen - I had expected that he will find this fine balance between the two. I must say that I was a tad disappointed, just a bit disappointed, on that note. And yet he is able to keep the audience engaged for the entire length of a quarter less than three hours - which is quite an achievement. However, to keep this engagement - the director surrenders to loud overacting and melodrama, because otherwise the lack of depth in the story or the many loose ends of the movie would become obvious. 

The movie starts with the story of personal struggles of Anand Kumar who is keenly interested and is very talented in mathematics - but the infinite constraints of he being from a poor family breaks his back completely and he was almost relegated to be a faceless of crores of talented Indians who fail to make a mark. This part is well made and is indeed inspirational. It is also very real and convincing. One could feel the anguish of being a talented student among a crowd of smug, ignorant and unappreciating set of people for whom the most empathy with the guy was to get him a job in the post office. It is disheartening to see such talent go waste.

However, soon a commercial almost trivialised bollywood drama unfolds as his life changes from someone aspiring to become a PhD in mathematics to the best known face in the coaching world of the coveted IIT admission business and then transforms into a idealist out there to fight for struggles of unknown underprivileged kids.

The eternal need to have a heroine and a villain in the story of a Hero makes the movie look like a fictional - less convincing - bollywood commercial film in the second half. I would say Mr. India released wayback in 1987 had portrayed the struggles of a man supporting the kids better without a biopic. So there is a "Mogambo" - the CEO of a large coaching business who does everything on and off the book, most unconvincingly though, to kill the Anand Kumar story. Then there is the "calendar" - the brother of Anand Kumar who is beside him in his thick and thin - nondescript but a stellar support. Oh !! and can I forget "Seema" the heroine of Mr. India trying to bring about some "namak" in an otherwise plain daal-rice story of a struggler. And yes - it was needed that the Army of the "Mogambo" will fight a head-on battle with the hero and eventually lose it to an unexpectedly smart and well equipped set of poor starving kids.

{For the uninitiated Mogambo, Calendar and Seema the reporter are unforgettable characters of an immensely successful shekhar kapur superhit "Mr. India" - the parallels to that movie of Super thirty are uncanny} 

My problem is not, that these stories are fictional - we all know that they are actually true. That Anand Kumar was shot at, almost killed. That when he was in the hospital - he was attacked by a gang of goons - but the flight of fancy that the director took in picturisation of this sequence turns the movie into a rajnikantish manmohan desai flick minus the imaginative fine execution of either manmohan desai or shekhar kapur. While one was expecting a very real and earthly "chillar party" style of handling those sequences by the Director of that immensely likeable  movie.

My problem is also that to turn the protagonist into super hero everyone else is willified and looked down at. So the entire coaching business is education mafia, the entire rich class students and privileged and hence shown as someone grabbing opportunities of the poorer students. That there is no financial or other support to the poorer students of the society that they are almost completely exploited lot. Such caricatures actually increases the distance between the haves and have nots in their psychology. It also builds the perception that only rebellion against such exploitation is the way out for the downtrodden. I think the world around us had changed a lot. 

There are far too many loose ends - a don calling the protagonist from a Bihar jail asking for a cut or closing down his class is simply told on the phone that none is happening and then he does nothing; just vanishes in thin air. The sequence in which the Super thirty competes with the students of Excellence, are defeated and then are saved from closing the venture down was a pathetic attempt to make the heroine relevant. I think that was the weakest part of the script. The English play by the Hindi/bihari speaking students to gain confidence among the elite english speaking student was another unconvincing drag of the sort, while it tried to convey an excellent message actually. Even the attempt to murder the protagonist is stretched and so spills over to look quite unreal. The most unreal part happens to be the climax sequence in which the students of Anand Kumar gangs up to save him from an attack on the hospital. The effort to show that they used the concepts learnt in the classes in dealing with these goons is interesting but unreal.

On the positive side - the academic brilliance of Anand Kumar has been imaginatively captured and picturised. The need for a teacher to go beyond the subject and delve into the psyche of the student and help him/her in areas beyond the subject is well sketched and presented. The unholy nexus between education, politicians and goons is real and palpably presented. The sequence when the kids finally succeeds is very well cultivated and leaves us poignantly happy.

Hrithik Roshan is intense and sincere as always. He played the Anand Kumar rather well. He only looks unconvincing when trying to portray the helplessness of Anand Kumar - like when he sells Papad or when he goes for help to the coaching class CEO. The problem with most Hrithik Roshan movies is that his character dominates the movie so much that most other characters remain underdeveloped. So, despite an almost three hour long movie - most other characters remain distant and obscure for the audience. Mrunal did a fine job of whatever little she was given to do. Virendra Saxena and Pankaj Tripathi both leave a mark in very limited roles that they were allowed. Aditya srivastava through a  fine actor was a victim of underdeveloped character. To keep Anand Kumar as a hero he was sketched as a weak, acute kind of a leader who has little idea of what he was doing and often fails in execution. On the other hand - he is also someone who converted Anand Kumar into a brand. Really !? The group of kids were underwhelmingly developed. The movie tried to paint these kids successes as and only because of Anand Kumar. 

Honestly the background music is a disappointment - nothing really is hummable or memorable. It is at places loud and uncomfortable - specially the Hindi Play song "no no no .............". Even the dialogues could have been far better. That would have lent more power to the movie and were badly missing. Only the one where Anand kumar says "ये अमीर लोग अपने लिए खूब चिकना सड़क बनाए, हमारी राह में ऐसा बड़ा-बड़ा गड्ढ़ा खोद दिए. लेकिन यहीं वो सबसे बड़ी गलती कर दिए. हमको छल्लांग लगाना सिखा दिए." leaves you with some jest. In fact the signature dialogue "आज राजा का बेटा राजा नहीं बनेगा. राजा वहीं बनेगा जो हकदार होगा" repeated many times sounds cliched and devoid of any impact.

So then if you have read this review till now, you will ask me why am I saying it is a good movie to watch - probably because of Hrithik and because it's an entertaining movie. Don't look for too much inspiration - it is there in bits and pieces but you are fairly entertained with loud music, acting and delivery. It's not quite in the class of Milkha Singh or Mary Kom. It tries to be three Idiots but is miles away from it. And yet its a good one time watch. It does bring out the disparity and unfair competition. Don't look for an inspirational biopic - instead look for a superhero who sacrifices himself to create success out of hopeless poodles. Don't look for a commercial pot-boiler on the edge of the seat entertainment - but enjoy the emotional, often loud picturisation of human misery, glory, frustrations, successes and the myriad puzzle called life. Good one time watch. If someone was to watch it a second time - there will be too many flaws obvious.