Thursday, May 20, 2010

Why 3G Spectrum price tag is just not right.

Indian Govt. gets a whooping 68K crores from the auction of 3G spectrum. Check the news here. Looks like good news isn't it? Pranab da only planned for Rs. 35K cr. revenue in his budget. This difference alone would mean that he can bring down fiscal deficit by half a percentage point. Magical good news. Not really !! Here is why.

Not many of my age would forget what a luxury a telephone was in our days. My dad booked one with dot when we hardly needed one (or at least thats what we always believed). Telephone was not really a tool to communicate but something that businessmen would need. Our connection was given to us in four years time. Communicating with friends, relatives used to be time consuming and expensive.

Then came private telephony, pagers, mobile telephony service and then Internet (not necessarily in that order). The initial airtime charges for mobile telephone were in the range of 14-30 Rs. per minute. But soon companies understood the sheer scale of the business. Today talk time on mobile is virtually free compared to those days - and what has that done to our lives?

Look around yourself & you would find the way communication revolution has changed our lives (transformed is a better description). Today a cellphone has become a very cheap substitute for an office in lots of businesses. Any kind of home service business (libraries, groceries, hardware support, taxis etc.), brokers (from share mkts, to real estate to commodity traders), Milkman, housemaids, packed food services, information dissemination (ask me services for all businesses). None of these and many more need an office now. All they need is a phone number. Thats all. It has reduced the substantial advantage that businessmen with fixed assets had over startups.

It has given families confidence to let their children (including girls) to travel around the globe in pursuit of better education and superior professions without losing the family link or without feeling insecure. This single fact has probably contributed to the country's GDP more than what the country would have invested in the infrastructure to bring about this telecom revolution.

It has made information flow easier and hence speeded up buying decisions. It has reduced arbitrage opportunities and has made middleman less relevant and hence made them more honest and efficient. It has taken voice based services to locations where it is better value for money. All in all it has made transactions more transparent, easy, fast and cheap. It has provided more people jobs then could ever be imagined.

If you have read this post till now - you probably have understood where am I taking you. What telephony did to us in the last two decades is what high speed wireless internet over the phone can do to us in less then five years. Think if you could seamlessly book tickets, trade on the capital mkts., carry banking transactions, shop everything and anything, look for options/information, compare products, communicate - email and socialize from anywhere in the world at any time, at jet speed and at almost no cost - what would happen?

Economy will grow, per paisa productivity improves, people (yes aam aadmi) benefit. Sure all these would happen. But sadly the huge price Telcos are paying will make this happen slower then the pace at which I would love to see it happen. It would have been great if Govt. would have given away the spectrum free and would have imposed heavy penalty for non-usage or underusage of the spectrum. This would have speeded up the revolution.

Transaction and access costs will be higher then the reach of most people who could really use these services. Initially this might only benefit businesses that could can afford the additional cost or will be used by children of rich people to download heavy stuff (games, videos etc) from the web, or would be used by Investment bankers to make jazzy presentations from their handsets.

But we will not see a Sabjiwala bidding for the morning supplies of fresh vegetables on his phone or for that matter - I might still not be reading my daily newspaper and novels on my handset - not yet.

Well !! we could have done without that cut in the fiscal deficit this time.

7 comments:

  1. "It would have been great if Govt. would have given away the spectrum free and would have imposed heavy penalty for non-usage or under-usage of the spectrum. This would have sped up the revolution."

    Wow, what an idea sir jee! Hats off!

    3G has become obsolete though. Our generation witnesses the non-renewable 4G. But one might require to do a research project which might help us consider the economic feasibility for the usage of 4G in the times to come.

    Once upon a time we used to get water for free, and then a time came when the governments started charging us: The Water Taxes.

    We have always filled-in the air, in the tubes of our two wheeler tyres at the petrol pumps [we still do] for free.

    So now is the time we pay our TAXES for the same, to the governments, for using this free air for all these years, at once, for all kinds of waves travelling through them, in order to use these G-TAKE-NO-LO-G which is merely helping these government bodies sweep up all our sweat earned moolah just real fast, whether it gets used up for any concrete infrastructural development of our country or not. :( :)

    I am awaiting a day when the banks will charge us interests for keeping our sweat earned money in their banks, maintaining our very own technologically advanced bank accounts. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi !! Ashita

    sometimes we are unfair to governments as you have been in your comment.

    First, water tax is not a charge on water - it is a charge for delivering potable water at your doorstep. Govts. currently charge next to nothing for that. This ofcourse cannot be said of Spectrum.

    Second, I am sure we shall charge clean air one day - because we are polluting it at alarming rate today. Something that happened to water earlier.

    Banks would charge you interest for keeping your money when we phase out paper and plastic money and will shift to electronic money totally. It would be something similar to NSDL/CDSL that charges us to keep our shares in demat form.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @ Akash


    Agree 1 !!

    Agree 2 !!

    Agree 3 !!


    And now I am speechless! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very well written sir..!!

    I would like to make a point here is that
    As we all know that India is country where any new technology picks up only when the the common man start using it.

    We are talking about the wireless internet, but only 10% of the population of India is using Internet. So this clearly shows that AAM AADMI of our country is still very reluctant to adapt to new technologies. So govt. has to do something so that every individual can make the most of it.

    But contrary to this there is a big advantage of introducing new technologies. As we all know that 2/3rd of the population is below 35 and youths are well versed with the New Gadgets and technologies. So keeping this thing in mind we can say that it can be great hit in coming days...!!!

    Yes sir I truly agree with you point at the end that initially it will surely be used by business professional who want to compete with their peers and also by rich people who are fond of new gadgets and technologies.

    Like Mobiles took a decade to reach to common man, the wireless internet and 3G will take at least 5 years for a common man to get familiar..!!!

    It feels great reading your blog....!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello !! Vedang

    Thanks for passing by and for your comment. It also feels great when you guys read this stuff.

    The point I wished to make was that it should not take 5 years for common man to start using 3G/4G services as that will only delay growth in economy.

    One way to ensure that could have been to keep spectrum cheap.

    Thanks for your comment.

    ReplyDelete
  6. All i could understand of our govt, is that it tends to focus on AJJ KA FAYADA, it forgets we need growth in long terms.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear Sonu

    Thanks for your comment.

    While what you said is true of our Govts. but if you think from their perspective what else do they have as alternative.

    Govts. who think of future and takes tough measures faces the prospect of losing elections. Sacrificing a Govt. in face of a tough decision, in my opinion, is not a sensible decision. Hence a good Govt. looks for opportunities to find situations to take long term decisions at times when they have space, time and manouverability.

    Thats good management. Freedom has its cost.

    ReplyDelete